--- description: Información actualizada sobre Box. Lee opiniones verificadas y descubre funciones, características, precios y usabilidad. Obtén rápidamente una visión general de ventajas y desventajas. Compara Box con productos similares. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Box: precios, funciones y opiniones | GetApp México 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Sistemas de gestión de contenidos CMS](/directory/276/content-management-system-cms/software) > [Box](/software/90760/box) # Box Canonical: https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90760/box Página: 1 de 227\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90760/box?page=2) > Box es una moderna plataforma de administración de contenido que permite que los usuarios administren activos y flujos de trabajo de aprobación en un solo lugar. > > Veredicto: 5653 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.4/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.4/5** | 5653 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Box - **Constitución**: 2005 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: USD 20.00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, bengalí, chino, chino tradicional, coreano, danés, español, finés, francés, hindi, inglés, italiano, japonés, neerlandés, noruego, polaco, portugués, portugués de Brasil, ruso, sueco, turco - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Australia, Canadá, China, Estados Unidos, India, Japón, Reino Unido ## Funciones - @menciones - API - Acceso móvil - Acceso sin conexión - Alertas y notificaciones - Almacenamiento de documentos - Almacenamiento seguro de datos - Anotaciones - Aplicación móvil - Archivo y conservación - Arrastrar y soltar - Asistencia multimedia - Asistencia por vídeo - Asset Lifecycle Management - Autenticación - Autenticación de dos factores - Automatización de documentos - Autorizaciones basadas en roles - Biblioteca de activos - Biblioteca de contenidos ## Integraciones (en total: 72) - Adobe Workfront - Airtable - AppOmni - AppSheet - Asana - Benchling - Bluebeam Revu - CI HUB Connector - ChatGPT - Claris Connect - Claude - CloudSign - Device Magic - Docusign - Envoy … y 57 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Sistemas de gestión de contenidos CMS](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/276/content-management-system-cms/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Sistemas de gestión de contenidos CMS](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/276/content-management-system-cms/software) - [Software de gestión de activos digitales](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/280/digital-asset-management/software) - [Sistema de gestión documental](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/284/document-management/software) - [Herramientas de colaboración](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/335/web-collaboration/software) - [Software de almacenamiento en la nube](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/350/cloud-storage/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Google Drive](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90762/drive) — 4.8/5 (28628 reviews) 2. [Google Workspace](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90761/google-workspace) — 4.7/5 (17732 reviews) 3. [OneDrive](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/91652/onedrive) — 4.5/5 (12885 reviews) 4. [Microsoft 365](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90725/microsoft-365) — 4.6/5 (14170 reviews) 5. [Microsoft SharePoint](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90850/sharepoint) — 4.4/5 (5470 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Excellent sharing tool" — 4.0/5 > **Chris** | *10 de julio de 2025* | Administración educativa | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: BOX has good sharing, integrates with MS Office tools. Easy to arrange storage and cascading permissions make it easy to safely and appropriately share with staff. Does require some forethought for setting folders and share cascade. > > **Puntos en contra**: Can be glitchy and requires consistent updating to continue integration with MS Outlook tools. I don't like that won't remember the previous actions, saving to or whether or not I want to create a box. Sharing experience is good, but not totally native in the same way that Google Drive works. Hard sell on people who are committed to google environment > > I was not a fully committed google drive user, so I was not resistant to start. I love that it integrates with MS Office (which google does not) so it is native to the work environment. Sharing is solid, and this is important. ----- ### "Very good file storage & collaboration platform" — 5.0/5 > **David** | *17 de abril de 2026* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The ability to send an "upload" only link to someone is a great feature when working with external people. It allows them to upload their files without being able to view or access the original folder or see what other people may have uploaded. The folder structuring is pretty standard compared to other platforms but Box does a really good job with granular collaboration permissions from the parent folder and down. Configuring organization wide settings is easy to setup as well. UI is modern, clean, and easy to navigate. > > **Puntos en contra**: Box is a little on the pricier side when compared to other platforms and some of the more advanced features are hidden behind an additional license/add-on. There is no native "team/shared folder" feature. If you need to create a team/shared folder, it has to be created within someone's individual account. You essentially need to start off with creating a service account user and then creating all your team/shared folders within that service account. > > Box overall is a very good file storage and collaboration platform. Web interface is easy to use and navigate and the desktop app syncs and works well within File Explorer or Finder. Its great when collaborating with external users because you can either give them access to a folder with granular permissions or you can generate a link for them to upload files to only. Reporting is good as well as you can report on all user and file/folder activity (for both internal and external users). It can be on the pricier side especially if you want some of the more advanced features such as a Shield or Goverance or Retention Policies. ----- ### "Not Sure About Box" — 3.0/5 > **Valerie** | *27 de abril de 2026* | Entretenimiento | Valoración de la recomendación: 4.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Box is a decent file storage program that allows for ease of access to files on the cloud. It has helped with team collaboration and productivity, especially in terms of storing, organizing, and sharing video files. > > **Puntos en contra**: Box has upload speed and file size limitations that make it very cumbersome to upload large video files. Uploads time out or have errors and require starting over. There's also no system in Box to help with organizing files. I wish they would implement an AI system, like Hey Eddie, that can scan files, describe them, group them into folders, and tag them so they're easy to find and search for. It's very difficult to do that manually all the time, especially when working on a small team that works on 24 events a year. The manual time it takes to sort things correctly in Box cuts into our productivity, > > It's very mixed. On one hand, it's easy to share files across teams and collaborate. On the other, the limitations of this platform can really cut into our ability to be more creative and productive. I wish they had a better solution for creative teams, especially video teams. However, if you're just looking for a document sharing system (or not large files or a high volume of files), this should be fine. ----- ### "Box has been working really well" — 5.0/5 > **Shawn** | *14 de junio de 2026* | Marketing y publicidad | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Box has been working and storing all of my files as well as sorting them via the folder templates automatically. I was also concerned about integrating with DocuSign causing us to lose control of our network but thankfully that did not occur either. We are currently able to store over 20TB of data in Box. As an added bonus, since the conference room has been double booked and the other group is literally going to kick me out of here in the next few minutes, I will be able to complete this review very quickly. You may set-up automation rules based upon client types. Sometimes the OCR does read the text. > > **Puntos en contra**: Since the desktop companion app freezes so frequently, I have to close/reopen it each time I attempt to scan a document using the local office scanner. In addition, loading large video files takes too long. If you forget to enter even one metadata tag, the file disappears completely due to the fact that search is extremely strict/unforgiving. > > Prior to Box, users were leaving numerous unorganized files throughout their computers/hard-drives, however these files are now stored in Box. Admin time for opening new user accounts has decreased by approximately 40% thanks to Box. The customer support is excellent. ----- ### "CLOUD STORAGE" — 4.0/5 > **Andrea** | *17 de octubre de 2025* | Ingeniería industrial o mecánica | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: As a consultant working with sensitive and complex engineering data, security and controlled access are my top priorities. What I appreciate most about Box is its robust set of security and administrative features. The ability to create secure folders for each project and invite clients or team members with granular permissions (e.g., view-only, uploader, editor) is invaluable. This ensures that valuable intellectual property, like proprietary CAD designs for motorsport applications, is protected. Furthermore, the version control system is excellent. In mechanical design, we go through countless iterations. Box automatically saves previous versions of a file, allowing me to track changes or revert to an earlier design if necessary. This provides a clear audit trail and prevents the common issue of team members working off of outdated files. The platform serves as a reliable single source of truth for all project-related documentation. > > **Puntos en contra**: While Box is great for general file management, its performance and features lag when handling the specific demands of heavy 3D CAD files and complex assemblies. Syncing very large files (often several gigabytes) through the desktop client can be slow and resource-intensive, interrupting workflow. More importantly, Box lacks the specialized tools I rely on in dedicated Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems like Teamcenter or Windchill. It doesn't have an integrated 3D viewer that can properly render complex assemblies, check for interferences, or manage part dependencies and Bills of Materials (BOMs). This means I always have to download the files locally to do any meaningful engineering review, which adds an extra, inefficient step to the process. > > My overall experience with Box is positive, with the understanding that it is a tool for secure file sharing and collaboration, not a replacement for a dedicated engineering PLM solution. It excels at centralizing project documents, managing client deliverables, and facilitating communication around non-CAD files like specifications, reports, and presentations. The security infrastructure gives me confidence when sharing sensitive information with external partners. However, for the core task of collaborative mechanical design, it serves more as a secure repository than an active workspace. It's an excellent complementary tool in my digital toolkit for managing the business side of engineering projects, but it falls short of handling the high-performance demands and intricacies of iterative 3D design work. ----- Página: 1 de 227\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90760/box?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en GetApp](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90760/box) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Datos estructurados