--- description: Información actualizada sobre ComputerEase. Lee opiniones verificadas y descubre funciones, características, precios y usabilidad. Obtén rápidamente una visión general de ventajas y desventajas. Compara ComputerEase con productos similares. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: ComputerEase: precios, funciones y opiniones | GetApp México 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Programas de contabilidad para constructoras](/directory/25/construction-accounting/software) > [ComputerEase](/software/119639/computerease) # ComputerEase Canonical: https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/119639/computerease Página: 1 de 7\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/119639/computerease?page=2) > ComputerEase es un software de gestión de la construcción que ayuda a los contratistas a gestionar sus trabajos y empresas con funciones como cálculo de costes de trabajo (por ejemplo, creación de informes de trabajo en curso), contabilidad de construcción, gestión de proyectos, gestión de materiales, seguimiento de equipos, informes de salarios predominantes y más. > > Veredicto: 133 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.2/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.2/5** | 133 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Deltek - **Ubicación**: Herndon, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 1983 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: USD 5,000.00 - **Público objetivo**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Canadá, Estados Unidos ## Funciones - Acceso móvil - Budget Tracking - CRM - Comercial - Contabilidad - Contabilidad de acreedores - Contabilidad de deudores - Costes de trabajo - Creación de informes de sobrecostes - Creación de informes y estadísticas - Desglose de obras - Estimación de costes - Facturación - Gestión de contratos o licencias - Gestión de control de horas - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de facturas - Gestión de inventarios - Gestión de nóminas - Gestión de ofertas ## Integraciones (en total: 1) - ProEst ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Programas de contabilidad para constructoras](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/25/construction-accounting/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Programas de contabilidad para constructoras](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/25/construction-accounting/software) - [Software para la gestión de costes de tareas](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/1243/job-costing/software) - [Software de gestión de obras](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/28/construction-management/software) - [Software para subcontratistas](https://www.getapp.com.mx/directory/3075/subcontractor/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Viewpoint Spectrum](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90398/spectrum) — 3.9/5 (413 reviews) 2. [Procore](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/9704/procore) — 4.5/5 (2656 reviews) 3. [Premier Construction Software](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/104749/premier) — 4.7/5 (287 reviews) 4. [Buildertrend](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/90403/buildertrend) — 4.5/5 (2481 reviews) 5. [Acumatica Cloud ERP](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/44/acumatica-cloud-erp) — 4.4/5 (243 reviews) ## Opiniones ### Opinión — 4.0/5 > **Jerri** | *31 de octubre de 2012* > > Wow. When I last posted about using ComputerEase, we were lost. Our support team was non existent. I got a call from the Corporate office that quickly set us up with a new support group. They got us on the right track, helped us with issues we were having in payroll, mainly certified payroll settings. As anyone that has to complete certified payroll reports knows, they can be a nightmare. We are on the right track now. Corporate has been a lifesaver. We can email, call and they have an answer to our questions.. As with any new program, you need a great support team to help you with the transition from one program to another. We still have some things to work out, but with our new support team it will be completed correctly. Thank you Peggy and Lesley. And all that have helped with correctly setting up Computerease. \*\*UPDATE\*\* We are a Georgia based utility contractor. Our company has been using Computerease since 2008. Previously we wer using QuickBooks Pro for Construction. . The program was purchased prior to the current office staff that is now in place. They used it for a few months, then went back to QuickBooks. When the new staff took over in May 2007, the decision was made to use Computerease starting the beginning of 2008. I have to say, I do not find the program user friendly. It does not seem that one module talks to the other. The updates other than federal tax updates, really don't apply to Georgia. The appear to be more geared to the northern states. We make suggestions to our "Suppor team", and I use that word for the lack of another term , but nothing is ever done. Especially the accounting and payroll portion. We work on federally funded projects that require certified payroll reports. Each job, pay rates and fringes are different. We ask about setting up the union portion of the payroll to ensure payrates and fringes were correct. We were told not to use that section. If an employee works on a certified payroll jobsite and one that is not, the fringe is split between the two jobs so it appears on the report that we are not paying the correct fringe. We have to send copies of employee paychecks with the reports to show that the correct fringe was paid. Sorry, but, I am not only dissappointed with the product, but our support is basically non-existent. We call support and sometimes they call back. We called yesterday for example, and as of 3:52 this afternoon, have not received a return call. I emailed them twice last week, and although the messages were received and read, we never hear from support. ----- ### "A step up from QuickBooks" — 4.0/5 > **Kellie** | *6 de enero de 2015* | Construcción | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Hands down, the support is what I like best. They respond almost immediately and are very friendly. I also appreciate that the company is small enough that they accept recommendations for improvements and sometimes you see implementation as quickly as the next update. I feel it's an easy program to navigate and learn - far more so than some of the competitors I reviewed. However, some of my less technologically experienced co-workers have found it challenging. Honestly, I think that's a reflection of their limited exposure, not the program. I like (and sometimes dislike) that it is far more secure than QB - people can't change posted transactions willy-nilly\! The password maintenance is excellent and people only see what they have access to. Sometimes it's tricky because you think you're giving permissions to do something but you haven't checked another box that prevents it but, all-in-all, it's slick. The job costing feature is far superior to QB - no comparison. We haven't completed implementation of the Service Management module and are not using FieldEase to the full extent possible but I'm looking forward to exploring the possibilities. Being able to import time from the field has been a huge time-saver. The field employees grumbled at first and still do sometimes but not only has it saved time, it's improved accuracy. No more trying to decipher chicken scratch\! > > **Puntos en contra**: The reporting is not as robust as QuickBooks, and I really miss the ability to create just about any report imaginable. I also don't like that you sometimes have to go to multiple screens to get all the information related to a single transaction. Unlike QuickBooks, you can't drill down in every report - only certain ones have links. Some reports that you think should be standard are not and some cannot even be created without paying extra. If I could change one thing, the ability to drill down and customize reports like QuickBooks would be it. ----- ### "Does the basics, but is clunky to use and has terrible presentation." — 2.0/5 > **Elizabeth** | *14 de septiembre de 2017* | Construcción | Valoración de la recomendación: 1.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Does the basics of what a small construction company would need. Is flexible in certain ways, like setting up job cost codes. Prints to AIA billing forms. > > **Puntos en contra**: Costumer support is terrible. Templates are sloppy and unprofessional and clunky to use, so all need to be recreated by the company using them. Answer to one of my questions about generation of a purchase agreement was "there is a glitch in the system that requires text in a form field to generate the document" The text in that form field does not carry through to the PA itself... so we just need to type "x" and it will work. Report read outs look like they are from the 1980's. > > It seemed to have worked well for our company when we were a small GC, but now that we have grown to +$100M annually with multiple offices, it is struggling to meet the needs of the project managers. ----- ### "Overall, very pleased to be using CE as our accounting software solution." — 4.0/5 > **Mark** | *17 de enero de 2018* | Construcción | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Very intuitive interface. Workflows are great for frequent operations. Good module interface between modules. Relatively easy to train others to use. > > **Puntos en contra**: Some inflexibility when comes to the equipment module. Does not let us easily input our equipment use the way we use equipment. Would like equipment functionality in FieldEase. > > I had researched and implemented CE many years ago, when I was working in the commercial construction industry. When my current company (an industrial construction company) had the opportunity to use a different accounting solution, I recommended CE. I was very glad we made the switch and the recommendation was taken. ----- ### "Excellent Product, More than excellent support, excellent accountability and tracking." — 5.0/5 > **Beverly** | *26 de septiembre de 2017* | Servicios | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The "transparency" of the data; the ability to have "drill-down" reports for the data displayed. Great "paper trails" to help analyze and understand just exactly where the data came from that is used in the reports. There are no limits to this software. The only limits on this product will be from the end user, not the product. Also, if you require a custom report the good people at ComputerEase can create it for you. ComputerEase support is unequaled; it is provided with a simple phone call or through the software itself with a direct link to their Customer Corner where you can go online and research yourself or request support. > > **Puntos en contra**: I have been using this product since 2008; I do not have any "cons". As I've stated above the only limit will be on the inability of the user to know what they want and why/how to get it. ----- Página: 1 de 7\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/119639/computerease?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en GetApp](https://www.getapp.com.mx/software/119639/computerease) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Datos estructurados